Spark This
  • Spark This
  • About This
  • Subscribe To This
  • Search This

Democracy or Freedom?

10/28/2013

3 Comments

 
Quebec Premier Pauline Marois has just announced that she will not go to the polls this fall, but Quebecers across the province still have municipal elections to look forward to in six days’ time. Well, maybe “look forward to” is a bit strong.

Whenever it comes time to vote, I start to think about the purported benefits of democracy. I do believe that having a say in how and by whom we are ruled is better than having no say, as it was in days of yore, and as it still is in some backwaters like North Korea. And democracy is certainly preferable to violent coup as a means of transferring power. But why do we have to be ruled at all? Why should some individuals have power over others in the first place?
Maybe we need some kind of minimal, night watchman state to deal with criminals in an organized fashion—to protect the innocent and apprehend the guilty. But as Michael Huemer asks in his excellent book, The Problem of Political Authority, why should the state have the power to do other things that you and I have no right to do? If I tried to micromanage my neighbours’ affairs or coerce them into supporting some charitable cause I consider worthwhile, they would rightly tell me to mind my own business. If I tried to confiscate their property and give it to a friend’s company or spy on them indiscriminately on the off chance that one of them might be planning to commit a crime, things would get ugly. What, then, makes it acceptable for government actors to do such things? The stamp of approval of a majority of voters? Why?

Even if democracy worked well, I don’t see how the mob should have the right to tell you how to live or decide how to spend money that you earn. But of course, there are plenty of reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as we might hope, from voter ignorance to special interest group lobbying to regulatory capture.

It’s not that I would trade democracy for dictatorship—but I would trade it for freedom. Instead of letting the majority, or its representatives, decide things for everybody, why not let individuals decide things for themselves?

By all means, if you know for sure that one candidate is better than the rest and will wield the reins of power more conscientiously and with greater wisdom than the rest, go out and vote for him or her on Sunday. But you might also give a thought to what the world might look like if we kept that power for ourselves.
3 Comments
Mike Guetta
10/30/2013 01:20:04 pm

Word.

Reply
Larry Deck
10/31/2013 04:15:12 am

How about voting for the person you think likely to do the least damage? I hear the lesser of two evils is still evil, but as you point out in your post on <a href="http://sparkthis.weebly.com/2/post/2013/10/-most-americans-now-support-legalizing-pot.html">doobage</a>, it's sometimes a good idea to move beyond good and evil into a discussion of trade-offs.

Reply
Bradley Doucet
10/31/2013 08:20:03 am

Well, the lesser of evils is less evil...

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Who Writes This

    Bradley Doucet is a Montreal writer and the English Editor of Le Québécois Libre.

    More of This

    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Even More of This

    The Limits of Power: A review of Malcolm Gladwell's David and Goliath

    Math Education Should Be Set Free

    Santa on Trial

    What Does Greenpeace Have Against Golden Rice?

    Dear Sugar Man: Does a Nation Really Need a Charter of Values?

    To Dream a Possible Dream: MLK’s Famous Speech, 50 Years Later

    The Cost of Regulation: Why It's Worth Thinking About

    Is Government a Necessary Evil? A Review of Michael Huemer's The Problem of Political Authority

    The Planned Chaos of New Orleans, LA

    The Unplanned Order of Houston, TX

    Dynamists vs. Stasists: Virginia Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies, 15 Years Later