Spark This
  • Spark This
  • About This
  • Subscribe To This
  • Search This

Ender’s Game and The Book of Mormon

11/5/2013

6 Comments

 
I have yet to see the film adaptation of Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game, which opened this weekend, but the novel is one of my favourites—and its sequel, Speaker for the Dead, is even better. Both novels deservedly won the Hugo Award and the Nebula Award. Yet in addition to having created these much-loved works of art, Card is also a Mormon who believes homosexuality is unnatural and who opposes same-sex marriage. I think Mormonism is laughable, and I strongly disagree with Card’s views on homosexuality. Does this mean I should boycott the film, as some have called for? Should I stop recommending these books to people?
If you don’t think Mormonism is laughable, then you haven’t seen The Book of Mormon, the Broadway musical created by Trey Parker, Robert Lopez, and Matt Stone. Parker and Stone, of course, are the irreverent smartasses behind South Park. The songs they co-wrote here are beautiful and funny, sending up not just the kooky religion of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, but also the Disneyfied portrait of Africa in The Lion King.

But as much as The Book of Mormon pokes fun at Mormonism, I found its portrayal of Mormons to be very sympathetic. Actual Mormons might disagree, but I thought that the young missionaries struggling with their beliefs and stuck in difficult circumstances came off as very human. I felt for them, wanted them to overcome their obstacles. Being able to relate to the characters on stage surely has as much to do with the musical’s success as its snarky jokes and lovely tunes.

Which brings me back to Ender’s Game and Speaker for the Dead. What I loved most about those books, especially the second one, was the characters. The concepts were cool, and there were plot twists aplenty to keep me entertained, but the characters moved me. The compassion and clarity with which they tried, sometimes successfully, sometimes not, to express themselves and deal with conflict, often brought tears to my eyes. How many novels, much less science fiction novels, can do that?

I wish Orson Scott Card were not such an asshat when it comes to the topic of homosexuality. It certainly makes me think less of him. But he has given the world two really stellar works of art that have touched many, many people. I will see the movie, and I will keep recommending those two books.
6 Comments
Earl
11/7/2013 10:38:25 am

Looking forward to seeing the movie but I suspect that it will suffer from the same treatment as Starship Troopers. Reading the books allows for much more insight into the characters' motivations and conflicts. Hollywood will probably skip over all that stuff and focus on special effects, essentially ignoring the millions who have read the books and want to see an honest portrayal of the characters. I could be surprised...

Reply
Larry Deck
11/11/2013 05:57:36 am

You may be surprised, Earl. For sure it did not get the Starship Troopers treatment. A lot gets left out -- Peter and Valentine ruling the world through their blogs would look pretty silly at this point -- but I would say they captured the essence of it.

Reply
Larry Deck
11/11/2013 06:01:46 am

p.s. Starship Troopers got the treatment it deserves, and that too is a kick-ass movie.

Reply
Jack Ruttan
11/9/2013 03:22:35 am

You didn't actually say much about the books, except that their concepts were "cool," and the characters brought tears to your eyes. Can you enlarge on this? I was wondering if and how the books related to Card's Mormonism.

Reply
Bradley Doucet
11/9/2013 03:40:11 am

Hey Jack, I didn't want to give anything away, but as for religion, to the extent that it plays a role, I did not find that it was preachy or that it took anything away from the story. I know several other non-religious people who felt the same way.

Earl, I also hope to be pleasantly surprised by the film. We'll see.

Reply
Mike Guetta
11/19/2013 11:47:23 am

I would love those books even if Hitler had written them. It would be puzzling that something so interesting, insightful and well wrought had emerged from such a hateful source, but, as Maimonides said, "Accept the truth from wherever it comes."

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Who Writes This

    Bradley Doucet is a Montreal writer and the English Editor of Le Québécois Libre.

    More of This

    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Even More of This

    The Limits of Power: A review of Malcolm Gladwell's David and Goliath

    Math Education Should Be Set Free

    Santa on Trial

    What Does Greenpeace Have Against Golden Rice?

    Dear Sugar Man: Does a Nation Really Need a Charter of Values?

    To Dream a Possible Dream: MLK’s Famous Speech, 50 Years Later

    The Cost of Regulation: Why It's Worth Thinking About

    Is Government a Necessary Evil? A Review of Michael Huemer's The Problem of Political Authority

    The Planned Chaos of New Orleans, LA

    The Unplanned Order of Houston, TX

    Dynamists vs. Stasists: Virginia Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies, 15 Years Later