Spark This
  • Spark This
  • About This
  • Subscribe To This
  • Search This

Is Doing What You Love a Bad Thing?

1/16/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
It's a piece of advice that everyone from Steve Jobs to Oprah Winfrey has doled out: Do what you love. But according to Miya Tokumitsu writing in Jacobin, this popular mantra "leads not to salvation, but to the devaluation of actual work, including the very work it pretends to elevate—and more importantly, the dehumanization of the vast majority of laborers." In defending this claim, she betrays an ignorance both of basic economics and of how the world has improved over the past few hundred years.

It is true that doing what you love remains a privilege in the world today. For most people living in poor countries, it is an impossibility. Even for poorer people in the wealthier parts of the world, it remains difficult. But for many, many people—and many more people with each passing year, despite what Tokumitsu implies—it is a real possibility thanks to the world's explosive economic growth since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. Due to modern technology, instead of nearly everyone being involved in agriculture, only a percentage or two of the population is needed to produce the food we need. With increasing mechanization, manufacturing too now requires far fewer hands to build more and better stuff.

As a result of this stunning progress, much of the world is far wealthier than it used to be. This doesn't just mean that many of us can consume more; it also means that many more people can pursue work that is intellectually or artistically stimulating. It will of course be even better when we have become wealthy enough that people the world over will have access to better, more fulfilling work. But it is already worth recognizing and celebrating, and I don't see how doing so implies any dehumanization of those who still labour at tedious or back-breaking jobs.

As for devaluing the work it pretends to elevate, what Tokumitsu means is that people who love what they do are sometimes willing to do it for less money, which in her eyes is a sure sign of exploitation. But how much people earn at different jobs depends on a great number of factors. One of them is that if a lot of people find a certain kind of work enjoyable—say, writing—but there is only enough market demand for a small fraction of them, then many (typically those with comparatively less talent or experience) will be willing to work for less money. There is nothing sinister in this, just simple supply and demand.

Fortunately for people like me, many of us in the industrialized world, even if we aren't wealthy, are generally wealthy enough to make this trade-off. If we want to, we can work at part-time jobs that allow us to live modestly by modern standards (but very well by historical standards) while we pursue the work that we find more completely satisfying, that we perhaps consider to be a calling. Working for less money for a while doesn't mean that I'm being exploited, and pursuing my personal happiness doesn't mean that I don't care about the plight of those with fewer opportunities—especially those who live in countries with substantially less freedom, and hence less wealth. Indeed, in my case, I hope that the ideas I write about can help us all become even freer and wealthier than ever.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Who Writes This

    Bradley Doucet is a Montreal writer and the English Editor of Le Québécois Libre.

    More of This

    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Even More of This

    The Limits of Power: A review of Malcolm Gladwell's David and Goliath

    Math Education Should Be Set Free

    Santa on Trial

    What Does Greenpeace Have Against Golden Rice?

    Dear Sugar Man: Does a Nation Really Need a Charter of Values?

    To Dream a Possible Dream: MLK’s Famous Speech, 50 Years Later

    The Cost of Regulation: Why It's Worth Thinking About

    Is Government a Necessary Evil? A Review of Michael Huemer's The Problem of Political Authority

    The Planned Chaos of New Orleans, LA

    The Unplanned Order of Houston, TX

    Dynamists vs. Stasists: Virginia Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies, 15 Years Later