Spark This
  • Spark This
  • About This
  • Subscribe To This
  • Search This

The Future of Solar Power Is Bright

11/7/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
I love the idea of getting energy directly from the sun. Not that I hate the idea of getting it from other sources, even from much-vilified fossil fuels. But other things being equal, solar power is better because it doesn’t pollute, and pollution is bad by definition. So I very much look forward to the day when other things are, in fact, equal.

And really, those other things boil down to cost. Sunlight is free, of course, but turning it into electricity isn’t. Storing that energy so it can be used when the sun don’t shine also has a cost. Solar power is a lot cheaper than it used to be, but it’s not really competitive with more conventional energy sources yet. A week-long Economist Debate that closed yesterday explored whether it soon will be, and importantly, what might be done to bring the cost down faster.

Some cheer the government subsidies, mandates, and tax credits that currently support the solar power industry, especially in countries like Germany, where subsidies are high and electricity prices are higher. On the back of the economies of scale made possible by such involuntary taxpayer investments, the cost of solar power has indeed come down. But as the appetite for continued taxpayer support wanes, this business model is looking shaky.

More importantly, as Matthew Stepp of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation points out in the debate, “solar policy advocates are too focused on prioritizing the deployment of today’s technologies rather than supporting the development of cheaper, better solar and storage technologies.” As he explains, deployment can lead to gradual improvements in technology and cost reductions, but only R&D can produce the breakthrough innovations that will really make solar power competitive. All the money taken from taxpayers to subsidize uneconomical deployment is money that is not invested in the innovations needed to make it economical.

So should governments just redirect those tax dollars from deployment to innovation? Far better to just give that money back to the people who earned it. Not only is it their money, but when it comes to picking winners and losers in the race for R&D funding, venture capitalists with skin in the game will outshine government bureaucrats playing with other people’s money any day of the week.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Who Writes This

    Bradley Doucet is a Montreal writer and the English Editor of Le Québécois Libre.

    More of This

    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Even More of This

    The Limits of Power: A review of Malcolm Gladwell's David and Goliath

    Math Education Should Be Set Free

    Santa on Trial

    What Does Greenpeace Have Against Golden Rice?

    Dear Sugar Man: Does a Nation Really Need a Charter of Values?

    To Dream a Possible Dream: MLK’s Famous Speech, 50 Years Later

    The Cost of Regulation: Why It's Worth Thinking About

    Is Government a Necessary Evil? A Review of Michael Huemer's The Problem of Political Authority

    The Planned Chaos of New Orleans, LA

    The Unplanned Order of Houston, TX

    Dynamists vs. Stasists: Virginia Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies, 15 Years Later