Spark This
  • Spark This
  • About This
  • Subscribe To This
  • Search This

The Poverty of Minimum Wage Laws

1/20/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Even in a free market that perfectly respected property rights, some people would be poor through no fault of their own. For a variety of reasons, this is even more true of our mixed economy. There is also the question of how children could possibly be said to deserve their initial lot in life. These considerations argue in favour of some kind of aid to the undeservedly poor. But are minimum wage laws the best tool for the job?

The title of a recent Washington Post article, "Economists agree: Raising the minimum wage reduces poverty," seems to suggest that they are at least a good tool for the job. Specifically, the article cites research showing that "raising the minimum wage 10 percent (say from $7.25 to near $8) would reduce the number of people living in poverty 2.4 percent." How can economists agree on this and yet also agree (79% of them) that a minimum wage "increases unemployment among young and unskilled workers"?

As a matter of fact, there is no reason why both cannot be strictly true. Minimum wage laws clearly help certain people by forcing their employers to pay them a higher wage than they otherwise would, and it may help some of them enough to lift them above the poverty line, thus technically reducing poverty. But it also hurts certain other people who are priced out of the labour market, typically the young who lack the skills to be worth the higher wage. Employers therefore choose to let them go or not to hire them in the first place. This raises unemployment, but it does not raise the number of poor people because those who are hurt are already poor. They simply go from being working poor to being unemployed poor. Hardly seems like an efficient way of reducing poverty.

Even ignoring the people harmed by the minimum wage—not that you should—these laws are a poorly targeted way of helping the poor. As Tyler Cowen points out, only about 10% of workers who would gain from federal minimum wage hikes in the US live in poor households. How can this be? Well, for one thing, about two thirds of those who would gain are "second or third earners living in households with incomes three times the poverty line." By all means, let's help the poor improve their lot, but let's at least be smart about how we do it.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Who Writes This

    Bradley Doucet is a Montreal writer and the English Editor of Le Québécois Libre.

    More of This

    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Even More of This

    The Limits of Power: A review of Malcolm Gladwell's David and Goliath

    Math Education Should Be Set Free

    Santa on Trial

    What Does Greenpeace Have Against Golden Rice?

    Dear Sugar Man: Does a Nation Really Need a Charter of Values?

    To Dream a Possible Dream: MLK’s Famous Speech, 50 Years Later

    The Cost of Regulation: Why It's Worth Thinking About

    Is Government a Necessary Evil? A Review of Michael Huemer's The Problem of Political Authority

    The Planned Chaos of New Orleans, LA

    The Unplanned Order of Houston, TX

    Dynamists vs. Stasists: Virginia Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies, 15 Years Later