Spark This
  • Spark This
  • About This
  • Subscribe To This
  • Search This

Us and Them and Our Biases

10/29/2013

0 Comments

 
I’m pretty grateful to be living in a relatively peaceful time and place. Violence, as Steven Pinker argued at length in his recent book, The Better Angels of Our Nature, has declined considerably over the centuries and decades. Admittedly, this progress has been unsteady and uneven, and there’s still a lot of strife in the world. Also, as Pinker cautions, there’s no guarantee we won’t slide back into periods of increased violent conflict, which could be catastrophic given the phenomenal destructive power of modern weaponry.
Given how high the stakes are, then, it’s worth trying to understand why conflict persists, and what we might feasibly do about it. In a thought-provoking book review in The Atlantic entitled “Why Can’t We All Just Get Along?” author Robert Wright tackles the issue. His diagnosis: We have evolved to cooperate fairly well with members of what we see as our own group, but not so well with members of other groups, whom it at one time made evolutionary sense to view with suspicion. In a word, we are tribal.

What keeps us from getting along with the members of other tribes? Is it the fact that we have fundamentally different values? Do we need to resolve our ethical differences once and for all before we can get along?

Without entirely dismissing the importance of different values, Wright argues that much conflict is rooted in our self-serving biases. Think about how fans of opposing sports teams, say the Red Sox and the Cardinals, can watch the same game and both come away thinking that the umpires were favouring the other side. Then there’s the study in which Israelis and Arabs viewed the same media coverage of the 1982 Beirut massacre, and the two groups both considered it biased, but in opposite directions.

“Do unto others 20% better than you would expect them to do unto you, to correct for subjective error,” said double Nobel laureate Linus Pauling (Chemistry and Peace). Easier said than done, of course, especially when it comes to those others who are members of other tribes. But less of a challenge than coming to perfect agreement on every last moral issue, and if it will promote peace, a challenge well worth meeting.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Who Writes This

    Bradley Doucet is a Montreal writer and the English Editor of Le Québécois Libre.

    More of This

    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Even More of This

    The Limits of Power: A review of Malcolm Gladwell's David and Goliath

    Math Education Should Be Set Free

    Santa on Trial

    What Does Greenpeace Have Against Golden Rice?

    Dear Sugar Man: Does a Nation Really Need a Charter of Values?

    To Dream a Possible Dream: MLK’s Famous Speech, 50 Years Later

    The Cost of Regulation: Why It's Worth Thinking About

    Is Government a Necessary Evil? A Review of Michael Huemer's The Problem of Political Authority

    The Planned Chaos of New Orleans, LA

    The Unplanned Order of Houston, TX

    Dynamists vs. Stasists: Virginia Postrel's The Future and Its Enemies, 15 Years Later